「我離港前到過一間精神科醫院。當時有位病人禮貌地問,一個以作為世上最悠久民主政體而自傲的國家,如何能夠將此地交給一個政治制度非常不同的國家,且既沒諮詢當地公民,又沒給予他們民主的前景,好讓他們捍衞自己的將來。一個隨行同事說,奇怪,香港提出最理智問題的人,竟在精神科醫院。」彭定康 金融時報

“During a visit to a mental hospital before I left Hong Kong, a patient politely asked me how a country that prided itself on being the oldest democracy in the world had come to be handing over his city to another country with a very different system of government, without either consulting the citizens or giving them the prospect of democracy to safeguard their future. Strange, said one of my aides, that the man with the sanest question in Hong Kong is in a mental hospital.”Chris Patten Financial Times

Non Chinese literate friends, please simply switch to English Version provided by LOUSY Google Translation

Please participate in the unregistered demography survey of visitors at the right hand side bar. You are: ?

敬請參與在右下方的不記名訪客分佈調查問卷,你是: ?

Tuesday, January 05, 2010

Screwed Up



第二次世界遠東戰場《太平洋戰爭》,真是開打是因為日本,突襲夏威夷珍珠港的美國太平洋艦隊海軍基地,美國人子弟兵死傷很大,全國敵氣同仇,舉國動員,非要打敗日本人,佔領日本而後快,最終還把兩個『原子彈』,分別投下《廣島》和《長崎》,報卻大仇。


當時美國已經在歐洲參戰,對付由德意志共和國納粹黨,和意大利法西斯黨,發動的歐洲戰場。有說美軍的情報機構,一早知道日本會來突襲,並已經知會當時的羅斯福總統,但國防部和白宮都秘而不發,耐心等候,讓日本人發動了突襲,這都是要讓美國人一鼓作氣,舉國站起來,要求總統向日本宣戰,支持開辟另一個在遠東的戰場。


剛剛過去的聖誕日,在美國密芝根州底特律機場,有一宗企圖炸飛機的事件,美國舉國沸騰,剛巧這個恐怖分子炸機不遂,反被英勇的乘客制服,Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab 被捕,交了給警方 US marshals,為何不是 CIA 或 FBI 呢?傳說 Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab 將給予起訴,美國人會指派一位辯護律師為他辯護,會去到法庭。美國人將給予他,一個公平公正的判決,為恐怖分子做示範作用,以儆效尤,云云。


聖誕假期後,蛇竇的吹水會,有人提出一個『陰謀論』:

這個事件有著一連串的巧合,有人及時舉報了恐怖份子,但卻又偏偏得到了簽證,冥冥中讓恐怖份子上了機,況且他祇買了單程來美國的機票,而且用現金購買,又不帶寄倉行履,祇是一件隨身的行履,這麼容易就上了飛機,由阿姆斯特丹直飛密芝根州州底特律機場。


蛇竇認為這個是順水推舟計劃,事先安排好的事件,既知到有恐怖分子要來,先發出簽證 VISA,到時到侯奧巴馬去到夏威夷等候,就是要在『珍珠港事件』同一地點,由總統準備向全國發表演說,號召美國全國民,尤其是一些沒有拿定注意的美國人,齊齊起來,集中全國力量,支持重錘出擊,對付散佈在中東幾個國家的塔利班和阿爾蓋達組織。


可惜這位英國大學的好學生,尼日利亞的好孩子,並不是天生的恐怖分子,HE Screwed Up!


若炸機事件發生了,在美國本土上,死了二三百人,這就可以先轉移目標,讓美國站在道德高位,讓美國人攻擊也門的阿爾蓋達合理化,可以向也門發動“報復性”轟炸,並準備好用“巨大殺傷力”武器,切底殲滅也門的恐怖分子,粉碎他們的巢穴,這也不能怪責美國人,中東的阿拉伯人,俄國人,中國人冇聲出。


其次可以向在中東的“塔利班”和“阿爾蓋達”,當然包括阿庫汗“塔利班”和“阿爾蓋達”,發出警告,作出阻嚇性示範,好讓美軍可以在二零一一年,順利撤出阿庫汗。


如今,攪到國土安全部長,奧巴馬總統,白宮的發言人,一早準備好的宣戰步驟,突襲也門,通通打亂了,雖然他們已經準備好,會受到共和黨責難,但若最終受襲,死掉幾百人目的能夠達到,美國一定要報復,才能向死去的美國人家屬交代,但如今還能否動用”巨大殺傷力“武器,或是祇可以用”常規炸彈“報復呢?


至于善後和解釋為何漏了網,若一舉打出漂亮一仗,有了戰功,美國人顧著額首稱慶,一泄心頭之憤,其他都可以慢慢查,順便可以鏟除異己。但這個算盤打不響了,一切祇因為 HE Screwed Up!


英國和美國的也門大使館,已經關閉了,看來 retaliation 已經準備好,如箭在弦,祇是會是甚麼規模?



有冇咁兒戲呀?哈哈哈!就當茶餘飯後的吹水罷,紙包不著火,奧巴馬的幕僚不會行這一著罷,共和黨呢?唔知道!美國人向也門阿爾蓋達,發動報復襲擊,就在所難免了。



14 comments:

exile said...

This 陰謀論 is all over the internet. Thank goodness we still have freedom of speech! What I wonder is why he didn't just blow up the plane when it was in the air. Another 陰謀論 is that they are trying to market those body scanners to the world. Looks like a billion dollar business, eh? Space, Your 蛇竇 co-workers don't seem to have anything nice to say about America, haha....are they mostly Americans?

the inner space said...

Exile, conspiracy theories and/or collusion theories are common in politics.

Our 蛇竇 is like united nations, a mix of americans (black and white), chinese americans, indian americans, plus southern asians and HK Chinese(majority), several mainlander chinese, I think there are also two taiwan chinese,and in the past there were southern korean and japanese too.


My archive:Snake Den 蛇竇

macy said...

呢類陰謀論經常出現, 好似911係美國政府預知而讓其"順其自然"的發生, 讓他們有藉口去開戰, 攞著數; 好似新奧爾良的風災, 也說美國政府救災慢是因為想試驗人在天災下便變成怎樣狀況, 把災民當白老鼠...
我相信政府都當人民係實驗品,籌碼或貢品, 但事實之全部卻難以求證.

exile said...

Speaking of 9/11, I didn't leave the house for 3 days and just cried my eyeballs out every time I saw the towers went down or when Bush gave a speech.

It was then. Now I suppose Americans are much clearer about a lot of things.

收買佬 said...

常用陰謀論看世界﹐係會搞到人short short 地的。:)

the inner space said...

Macy 姐:你所提出的:
“911係美國政府預知而讓其"順其自然"的發生, 讓他們有藉口去開戰, 攞著數。

新奧爾良的風災, 也說美國政府救災慢是因為想試驗人在天災下便變成怎樣狀況。”

當年傳得很烈,空穴來風未必無因!

the inner space said...

Exile,Unless for business purposes, tourists will find the extraordinary security checking annoying. Did you see any statistics about the dropping of foreign tourists?

After the 12-25 incident the US further implement more checkings certainly affecting the tourism earnings.

the inner space said...

收收兄: “陰謀論”或“串謀論”,于尚有言論自由的社會中,難以避免。 就“高鐵”香港段,現在各有陰謀論,攪到香港社會分化!

exile said...

The U.S is not a country heavily relies on foreign tourism. Don't get me wrong. We love tourists from overseas but I think our main focus is on domestic travel and local business spending. In the past I seldom read/heard any serious discussion about losing revenue from foreign tourism in the media. Our economy is diverse enough that we don't have to rely on one aspect of a particular industry. Thank goodness.

National security always comes first. If you ask Americans, I think majority of them would vote for tighter airport security regardless of all the conspiracy theories out there. Myself included. Americans are funny. We complain a lot about our government but at the end of the day, we still put a lot of faith in the system. This is something I don't quite understand myself :-)

the inner space said...

Exile, That's simple US prohibits all foreign travellers into the country. WHY even president Bush did not ask the house and the snate to pass the BILL the ACT the legistlation? and signed by HIM right after 911?

exile said...

Come on, I said international tourism carries less weight than domestic tourism but doesn't mean we don't need tourists from abroad. You are being sarcastic, right?

the inner space said...

Exile, I am so sorry if that gives you negative feeling.

The cost for the security checkings and then the additional costs for the new implementation. All charging back on the Air-Tickets or Airport Tax i.e. passing back onto the travellers 用者自負。

After weighing the cost and benefit we believe it is a reasonable suggestion for Obama's government pushing that idea to the american public ~ no foreign travellers.

Our ”蛇竇“has such suggestion,I guess at least some americans or societies also have similar suggestion(s),for the sake of american security.

Obviously you do not appear supporting this idea.

exile said...

well, I guess if people don't like the current security procedure, they simple won't visit the U.S. It doesn't make any difference whether Pres. Obama cuts off international travel or not. So your co-workers think America should turn into North Korea? Cut ourselves off from the rest of the world. Sounds passive aggressive to me. I heard some Canadians decide to drive over instead.

I can say the same about visiting China. Tourist visa to China costs about US$100, lots of Americans still visit China. It's personal decision.

the inner space said...

Exile, Where there are opportunities to earn money business travellers will come.