My Facebook 新增面書 心空海嶽 by the inner space 歡迎光臨 Welcome in

「我離港前到過一間精神科醫院。當時有位病人禮貌地問,一個以作為世上最悠久民主政體而自傲的國家,如何能夠將此地交給一個政治制度非常不同的國家,且既沒諮詢當地公民,又沒給予他們民主的前景,好讓他們捍衞自己的將來。一個隨行同事說,奇怪,香港提出最理智問題的人,竟在精神科醫院。」彭定康 金融時報

“During a visit to a mental hospital before I left Hong Kong, a patient politely asked me how a country that prided itself on being the oldest democracy in the world had come to be handing over his city to another country with a very different system of government, without either consulting the citizens or giving them the prospect of democracy to safeguard their future. Strange, said one of my aides, that the man with the sanest question in Hong Kong is in a mental hospital.”Chris Patten Financial Times

Non Chinese literate friends, please simply switch to English Version provided by LOUSY Google Translation

Please participate in the unregistered demography survey of visitors at the right hand side bar. You are: ?

敬請參與在右下方的不記名訪客分佈調查問卷,你是: ?

Sunday, November 22, 2009

美國人的第一支冷箭



話口未完,奧巴馬訪華這個 Topic 都還未冷,美國人已經急不及待,發出第一支冷箭,目標當然是中國,但今次射埋香港,明顯是一個警告。美國人在中國暫時攞不到“甜頭”,美國人就找香港來開刀,打不到大人,就搵啲嘢嚟“洽”個細嘅!


【明報專訊】美國國會一個委員會周四發表報告,關注北京會利用香港,進口敏感的技術。

美中經濟及安全審查委員會在其年報中指出,美國對香港的出口較對內地的寬鬆,一些可能轉為軍事用途的敏感技術,即使禁止出口到內地,但可以出口到香港。

委員會主席 Carolyn Bartholomew 表示,雖然未發現有例子顯示有敏感技術從香港轉運到內地,但最近有傳言指出,香港海關的水平正在下降。報告要求華府加強與港府合作,防止非法轉運。



『司馬昭之心』~路人皆見!美國找個直口,不讓美國高科技進口香港,作為金融中心的《香港特區》,就容易讓星加坡、首爾、東京等等鄰近競爭地區趕上,比較下去,美國人居心險惡。


Carolyn Bartholomew 是乜誰?


還有“美中經濟及安全審查委員會”是甚麼的美國政府組織?


Carolyn Bartholomew 是 USCC 的 Chairwoman, USCC 全名是 US-China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC)美中經濟及安全審查委員會。


Carolyn Bartholomew, Chairwoman
Former Chief of Staff, Counsel, Legislative Director, and Foreign Policy Advisor to U.S. House of Representatives Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi; former Professional Staff Member on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Reappointed by House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi on December 17, 2007 for a term expiring December 31, 2009.


十一月十九日美國東岸時間週四發表了 2009年度的週年年報 Annual Report 內容談及香港特區。

Chapter 3 Section 3: Hong Kong 其中的一節: Due to its geographic convenience as a transshipment point, as well as the long-standing presence of Chinese government-affiliated intelligence and commercial interests, Hong Kong could emerge as a significant transshipment point for transfers of export-controlled technologies into China in violation of U.S. law.


USCC RecommendationThe Commission recommends that Congress examine and assess the adequacy of U.S. export control policy for dual-use technology as it relates to the treatment of Hong Kong and the PRC as separate customs entities. The Commission further recommends that Congress urge the administration to consider ways to collaborate more closely with the authorities in Hong Kong in order to prevent the transshipment of controlled technologies from Hong Kong into the PRC.


香港是中國向全世界的示范,表示英國人能把南中國海海岸的一個小漁村,建成一顆明珠~『東方之珠』,成為亞洲四小龍,再成為亞洲其中一個『金融中心』,在回歸之後,中國人是仍然可以保持香港繁榮穩定,英國人辦得到的,中國人也能辦得到,並且要比英國人幹得更好。


"USCC recommends that Congress examine and assess the adequacy of U.S. export control policy for dual-use technology as it relates to the treatment of Hong Kong and the PRC as separate customs entities." USCC 是想把香港和中國重新界定為 same entity 是同一伙。若遲了、慢了、少了,或沒能得到高科技進口香港,作為金融中心的《香港特區》,就必被星加坡、東京、首爾等等鄰近競爭地區比下去。香港若有甚麼閃失,將成為話柄口實,中國將會”面目無光!“


初步閱覽年報,有頗多屬于似是而非的指控,可以無限放大,有模仿撰寫《The Lost Symbol》、《Da Vinci Code》、《Angels and Demons》 丹·布朗寫小說的影子,信者則有,不信則無!但以明報報導的『美憂香港轉運敏感技術予華 』,最為影響香港特區 ,下面已做了連結,有興趣的朋友,可以閱覽整份年報,長達三百八十一頁。


後記:
蛇竇有討論:
"可能轉為軍事用途的敏感技術 Controlled dual-use technologies" ,范圍可以涵蓋硬件軟件,亦將會是一言堂,美國人話敏感就是敏感,就算有上訴機制,但運作緩慢,拖延、拖遲,往往要幾年,是用窒礙,來扼殺香港發展,也不止金融業運作。


藥療、設計、工程、運輸、教育等等范疇,都會因此受影響。例如:繪圖用的硬件軟件,設計用的硬件軟件,醫療 MRI透視人體的硬件軟件,都可說成可轉用來設計”戰機“、”船艦“、”火箭“、”導彈“等等軍事用途。


曾蔭權除了要保金融業,能得到最新的咨詢通訊技術,讓香港繼續成為《金融中心》,他倡導的《六大新產業》~ 教育、醫療、檢測及認證、環保、創新科技、文化及創意,加埋《四大支柱產業》~金融、旅遊、貿易及物流和專業服務,成為中美爭拗的犧牲者,也是美國國會利用來,警告和刺激中國。


後後記:
這不是第一個 USCC 年度報告,年年到時到侯都有,但據美聯社說是最 harsh 的報告,中國照例反駁,但祇限較次級外交官,大使級都懶得出聲。不過如上面篇明報新聞,今年的報告拉埋香港落水,美國明顯要嚟“洽”個細的,來警告和刺激中國。

【明報專訊】美國國會一個委員會稱,中國間諜正積極竊取美國機密,以加強軍事和經濟實力,中國駐美大使館強烈否認。

美中經濟與安全審查委員會在長達367頁的年度報告中說,北京正強化海軍建設,以便在與台灣爆發戰爭時,中國海軍可以阻止美軍的介入。

報告又聲稱,中國加強了網絡間諜和網絡戰能力,並對美國電腦網絡日益構成威脅。

該報告說,美國官員相信中國間諜「在規模、強度和專業化方面日益增長」,「中國是針對美國展開間諜活動最多的國家。」中國駐美國大使館發言人王寶東,對有關說法堅決予以否認,稱這些指稱「毫無根據、空穴來風、不負責任」。

美聯社引述王寶東說,該報告稱中國加強海軍建設是為了挑戰太平洋美軍,這種說法是「冷戰幻覺」。他指出,中國的軍費只是美國的很小一部分。王寶東抨擊該委員會年復一年地拋出一些不實指控「旨在誤導美國民眾」。

這份報告是在美國總統奧巴馬剛結束對中國的訪問後公布的。美聯社說,報告的對華立場,似乎比奧巴馬總統或前任總統布殊,更為強硬。

組建於2000年的美中經濟和安全審查委員會,由美國國會跨黨派小組所組成,負責調查美中貿易日益增長所造成的安全影響。



這個報告發表的日期,不早也不遲,在美國總統奧巴馬返國後,十一月十九日就發表供諸于世,美聯社說:『報告的對華立場,似乎比奧巴馬總統或前任總統布殊,更為強硬。』


美國派間諜入中國竊取中國機密,相信都不會少罷,一笑!再笑!再再笑!而且又自摑嘴巴,美國成立這種委員會,每年寫一些這樣的報告。奧巴馬在日本發表演說,不是說過 。。。。。。。。。! 再再再笑!


伸延閱覽:
美憂香港轉運敏感技術予華 雅虎新聞網
美國會指中國積極竊美機密 雅虎新聞網
US-China Economic and Security Review Commission 美中經濟及安全審查委員會~USCC USCC 官方網頁
USCC Charter USCC.gov
Carolyn Bartholomew, Chairwoman USCC.gov
2009 Annual Report by Chapters (November 19,2009) USCC.gov


10 comments:

新鮮人 said...

有寶咩?
淨係佢哋有高科技呀?
鬼得閑攞佢啲科技上去,
挑隙星吖!

the inner space said...

新鮮兄:不僅你要罵粗口! 我也差點在Office 說了句:”What the F@@K! “好在未哎出口收得切!

事實上不是祇有他們有高科技,而是香港一貫不少公司還用美製機和software,要轉就牽一髮而動全身,美國人居心險惡,郁唔到大中國,就”蝦“個細嘅。

微豆 Haricot said...

I just wonder what the interplay is like btwn the Republicans who want Obama to fail miserably both nationally and internationally, and those right-of-centre Democrats who still hold the cold-war era mentality when it comes to international affairs.

Anonymous said...

I thought Republicans are the ones who still hold the cold-war era mentality. Haricot, you may be talking about just a few Democrats. What if the Republicans and the Democrats actually take turn to play the good cop/bad cop game with China?

If I remember correctly, Republicans (especially during the Bush Administration) are the ones who sell "sensitive" technology to the Chinese. Democrats have been raising their opposition for a long time, so Pres. Obama's tougher action on China isn't new.

"美國派間諜入中國竊取中國機密,相信都不會少罷"

Of course. I am glad they do. It is part of the "cultural exchange", haha...

exile

Hyacinthus said...

我當覺得:來者不善,善者不來;咁厚臉的債仔我地並不是第一次見到,君不見本港積下的惡租客爛仔年來大把,行徑更有過之也...

不用擔心,阿爺也不是省油的燈,暗底下可能做了更多的事,祗是這全是國家機密,你我也不知道罷了...

the inner space said...

Hari big brother, US's D or R are both the same just the format the wrapping may differ!

Auntie Carolyn Bartholomew's close relationship with Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi revealed the Nancy-Barack interaction within the D party.

the inner space said...

Exile from HK, US pays much more for spying on China from inside and within!

the inner space said...

風子:同意你的比喻! 你也是一位能運用小故事來說大道理的高手,新鮮人兄也是此道的高手。

Anonymous said...

It has taken me a long time to finally figure out that there aren't much difference between the R and D parties. Our President comes and goes but often those congressmen and women serve for decades. R&D indeed take turn to run the country. They make lots of deals under the table. A lot of issues American citizens don't really get to vote on. There is no real democracy in this world. Space, you are so right. They are just packaged differently. Our U.S Congress is kind of like the communist party in China (shame on me for saying that!) One good thing though, President Obama doesn't have absolute power. I suppose Pres. Hu doesn't either.

Just my 2 cents.

exile

the inner Space said...

Exile, that phenomenon holds true at most international policies,while domestically I did not follow as close as you do.