tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post8369504310968701520..comments2023-06-17T19:20:56.162+08:00Comments on Mind Necessity ~~~ 心 空 海 嶽: 從政者的胸襟The Inner Spacehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05847812875672255518noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-49996923455679060322009-01-18T11:06:00.000+08:002009-01-18T11:06:00.000+08:00風子:歡迎光臨留言,奧巴馬成名就是在上次2004年,為 John Kerry 在民主黨大會中演說,就...風子:<BR/>歡迎光臨留言,奧巴馬成名就是在上次2004年,為 John Kerry 在民主黨大會中演說,就是以“The Audacity of Hope" 為題。<BR/><BR/>In the end, that's what this election is about. Do we participate in a politics of cynicism or a politics of hope? John Kerry calls on us to hope. John Edwards calls on us to hope. I'm not talking about blind optimism here -- the almost willful ignorance that thinks unemployment will go away if we just don't talk about it, or the health care crisis will solve itself if we just ignore it. <BR/><BR/>No, I'm talking about something more substantial. It's the hope of slaves sitting around a fire singing freedom songs; the hope of immigrants setting out for distant shores; the hope of a young naval lieutenant bravely patrolling the Mekong Delta; the hope of a millworker's son who dares to defy the odds; the hope of a skinny kid with a funny name who believes that America has a place for him, too. <BR/><BR/>Hope in the face of difficulty. Hope in the face of uncertainty. The audacity of hope!<BR/><BR/>之後出版咗本同名的書:The Audacity of Hope" 副題是:Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream,<BR/><BR/>The audacity of hope:Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream 就是 奧巴馬 sell 給美國民眾的賣點。<BR/><BR/>Well,蔡子強的書 新君王論II,有一章說 Chris Patten 彭定康當年給曾蔭權的評價是:talkative,查 The Pilgrim's Progress by John Bunyan 書裡面有一個人物就是 talkative 嘞!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-85176038977514376772009-01-17T13:20:00.000+08:002009-01-17T13:20:00.000+08:00謝謝下刪百五字。。。再下刪二百字。。。又再下刪五十字!哈哈哈哈 ... 今時今日,什麼經驗模型理論都...謝謝下刪百五字。。。再下刪二百字。。。又再下刪五十字!哈哈哈哈 ... <BR/><BR/>今時今日,什麼經驗模型理論都不管用,也許因為沒有往蹟可言,這令奧巴馬身處零負擔, 更可放心大搞特搞, 我對他的表現有相當期望, 也希望他能為自己走出一段輝煌的總統路!<BR/><BR/>另,我們的曾特首真的不值一提,死蠢一個 :(Hyacinthushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02727922001503208688noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-64534165948455233162009-01-17T03:21:00.000+08:002009-01-17T03:21:00.000+08:00咁夜呀 Imak 姐,Smart Boss + Smart Employee = Profit Sm...咁夜呀 Imak 姐,<BR/>Smart Boss + Smart Employee = Profit <BR/>Smart Boss + Dumb Employee = Production <BR/>Dumb Boss + Smart Employee = Promotion <BR/>Dumb Boss + Dumb Employee = Overtime<BR/><BR/>Pretended smart boss + Pretended smart employees = HK SAR Government<BR/><BR/><BR/>笨拙的或自認是笨拙的 加 笨拙的或自認笨拙的 <BR/>會犯錯但最多是犯小錯因為他們小心行事,<BR/>最怕的是<BR/>自以為聰明的扮聰明的 + 自以為聰明的扮聰明的,<BR/>犯大錯的機會最大更多,而且絕對唔肯認錯!<BR/><BR/>剛剛睇完DVD,見到你咁捧場,先謝過了!答埋你先上床睡覺,好了,明天再續。<BR/><BR/>早抖!spaceAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-86412004087661201652009-01-17T02:35:00.000+08:002009-01-17T02:35:00.000+08:00曾特首究竟是 smart boss + 一班平庸手下?或是一個smart 下屬(其實曾特首做財爺果陣...曾特首究竟是 smart boss + 一班平庸手下?或是一個smart 下屬(其實曾特首做財爺果陣好似二醒過依家好多) 跟著個stupid boss?!?imakhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10548725016828742883noreply@blogger.com