tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post6136043917011445134..comments2023-06-17T19:20:56.162+08:00Comments on Mind Necessity ~~~ 心 空 海 嶽: 選賢選言The Inner Spacehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05847812875672255518noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-19871011611804007252009-11-28T01:05:35.648+08:002009-11-28T01:05:35.648+08:00喺囉!新鮮兄,我揾唔到啫,可能真喺有,所以希望各位仁兄仁姐,不嫌棄賜告囉。
回應返新鮮兄:《重氣節...喺囉!新鮮兄,我揾唔到啫,可能真喺有,所以希望各位仁兄仁姐,不嫌棄賜告囉。<br /><br />回應返新鮮兄:《重氣節不侍二主和不提齊桓公有什麼關係呢?》<br /><br />我咪話咗:“這是和中國人崇尚氣節,古時強調做人要有骨氣,絕對不侍二主,是否管仲因為轉了老闆,所以不作表揚。為此,連齊桓公的胸襟、氣度、器量,任用管仲,<b>都均一低調處理?</b>”<br /><br />因為一提齊桓公不念舊仇,就難免提起管仲侍二主,而春秋戰國之後的朝代,歌頌氣節,史官們就低調處理,司馬遷就是漢朝的史官。春秋戰國後到秦朝,秦之後才是漢朝,也有可能是後人刪改了『史記』!the inner spacenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-21358357072746168292009-11-28T00:41:26.253+08:002009-11-28T00:41:26.253+08:00上文無或者你係網找不到,
不代表無喎!
還要:
重氣節不侍二主和不提齊桓公有什麼關係呢?
齊桓公係...上文無或者你係網找不到,<br />不代表無喎!<br /><br />還要:<br />重氣節不侍二主和不提齊桓公有什麼關係呢?<br />齊桓公係國君,<br />侍二主係管仲,<br />如果係都應該唔提管仲啦,<br />點會避提齊桓公來就他呢?<br />唔合邏緝!<br /><br />上面咪講過囉,<br />春秋戰國群雄並起,<br />有邊個不是侍過多主呢?<br />唔見得史家有大力批評的情況,<br />點解你好似無睇過我上面寫嘅嘢咁架?<br />同一個問題問完又問!新鮮人https://www.blogger.com/profile/02377898067921935975noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-2327450013969641062009-11-27T00:20:45.045+08:002009-11-27T00:20:45.045+08:00ops I meant the democratic party primary election!...ops I meant the democratic party primary election!the inner spacenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-60093399633132683552009-11-27T00:17:09.729+08:002009-11-27T00:17:09.729+08:00Exile, it has ties with your pres obama who recrui...Exile, it has ties with your pres obama who recruited his primary opponent rivalry hillary clinton to be his secretary of state. <br /><br />Probably you have read my 2 old articles at the bottom links.the inner spacenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-82134335584635363242009-11-26T23:38:13.653+08:002009-11-26T23:38:13.653+08:00exileexileAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-24535614370033586962009-11-26T23:37:14.400+08:002009-11-26T23:37:14.400+08:00Lost in translation. Don't know what you guys ...Lost in translation. Don't know what you guys are talking about. Know very little Chinese history. Can't understand ancient Chinese writing either.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-57213694652289502892009-11-26T23:33:20.378+08:002009-11-26T23:33:20.378+08:00新鮮兄:篇文主要就是問問各位,仁兄仁姐有冇記得囉!
》》上文祇說:太史公司馬遷讚『管鮑之交』,世人都...新鮮兄:篇文主要就是問問各位,仁兄仁姐有冇記得囉!<br />》》上文祇說:太史公司馬遷讚『管鮑之交』,世人都是歌頌 管仲 和 鮑叔牙 的相交,互雙欣賞,卻沒有半點提過齊桓公小白,不記前仇地任用曾射他一箭的管仲為宰相。我搜索孤腸,都記不起有句雙關成語。<br /><br />這是和中國人崇尚氣節,古時強調做人要有骨氣,絕對不侍二主,是否管仲因為轉了老闆,所以不作表揚。為此,連齊桓公的胸襟、氣度、器量,任用管仲,都均一低調處理?這點我還未想清楚,有冇朋友可以給一些意見?《《the inner spacenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-46596264559824946282009-11-26T16:15:27.383+08:002009-11-26T16:15:27.383+08:00無咩?
史記、通鑑一句都無咩?
我無睇過,
唔知喎!無咩?<br />史記、通鑑一句都無咩?<br />我無睇過,<br />唔知喎!新鮮人https://www.blogger.com/profile/02377898067921935975noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-65047877061322159882009-11-26T10:57:14.307+08:002009-11-26T10:57:14.307+08:00喺囉!點解無人讚下齊桓公小白不記舊仇呢?喺囉!點解無人讚下齊桓公小白不記舊仇呢?the inner spacenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-4221544905903358592009-11-26T06:32:23.894+08:002009-11-26T06:32:23.894+08:00雖然不知固中原因,
不能對澳門官員問題下定論,
不過就表面看來,
卻真像有人不滿曾經受到批評而不讓人...雖然不知固中原因,<br />不能對澳門官員問題下定論,<br />不過就表面看來,<br />卻真像有人不滿曾經受到批評而不讓人留任!<br />若然屬實,<br />此君非賢能之輩!<br /><br />春秋戰國各國並起,<br />許多謀士遊列各國以為受到任用,<br />就如孔子、蘇秦之輩亦然,<br />不見得"不侍二主"在當時有很大問題,<br />其實孔子雖謂管仲小器,<br />但亦讚其治國之能,<br />後人對管仲的功績也給予肯定的!新鮮人https://www.blogger.com/profile/02377898067921935975noreply@blogger.com