tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post6040828506669676473..comments2023-06-17T19:20:56.162+08:00Comments on Mind Necessity ~~~ 心 空 海 嶽: 人民素質展示The Inner Spacehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05847812875672255518noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-48930423464773339612010-11-08T10:36:34.425+08:002010-11-08T10:36:34.425+08:00Hari big brother, voluntary census questionnaire r...Hari big brother, voluntary census questionnaire reply without law enforcement mandatory compulsory obligatory how reliable the collected data??? 是否又是人權憲章做的好事?結果就是如倒錢入海,哈哈哈,加拿大!the inner spacenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-67482438098607518682010-11-07T15:55:56.712+08:002010-11-07T15:55:56.712+08:00結果: Despite the oppositions, the govt in power pla...結果: Despite the oppositions, the govt in power plans to proceed with their new policy.Haricot 微豆https://www.blogger.com/profile/13735177985545566818noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-82999248140712288002010-11-04T22:28:54.365+08:002010-11-04T22:28:54.365+08:00微豆兄:excellent X 2 愧不敢當!
這祇是滿足自己的好奇心,一路搜尋資料,順便記錄下來,...微豆兄:excellent X 2 愧不敢當!<br />這祇是滿足自己的好奇心,一路搜尋資料,順便記錄下來,用作將來翻查的資料。還有就是發表一吓,自己對祖國的關心,人民素質(軟件)還待改進,尚未達標,這種恨鐵不成鋼,心急如焚的心情。<br /><br />中國為何被歐美各國創造的所謂指數 GNP GDP HDI etc 牽著鼻子走呢?其實這些指數在外國多如恒河沙數,公平公正的有幾多呢?<br /><br />反而大部份都是存在 bias 的,於指數的數據資料收集過程,有利創造者的背後意圖,多過真正反映真實現象,而且資料收集方法,也存在很大的誤差率。<br /><br />若中國自己創一個新的 index 來量度咁又點呢?一樣會有人會有國家異議,爭埋一些不實際的虛榮,倒不如埋頭苦幹?<br /><br /><br />寫完文章後,又剛巧讀到一篇來自“路透社”的新聞報導。<br /><br /><b>英國路透社11月1日報道,原題:<br />中國開始普查,民眾心存戒備</b><br /><br />中國于週一開始進行10年一次的人口普查,普查結果將成為世界人口第一大國制定政策的基礎。從東部沿海的繁榮城市到西部偏遠山區,600萬人口普查員將在全國展開工作,他們將在10天內到府調查4億戶家庭,成為“和平時期最大規模的社會動員”。 <br /><br />此項工程將花費約7億元人民幣,90%的受訪者將回答18個細節問題。結果將於明年4月公佈。本次人口普查將首次根據實際居住地而不是戶口所在地進行統計。結果會有助於分析中國的城市化程度,掌握此前未統計的超生子女,並反映正在發展中的人口巨變。 <br /><br />調查將反映出13億人口如今近半數居住于城市,但很多人仍沒有城市戶口,這意味著他們未獲得正式登記。媒體報道稱,除了目前已在城市工廠和建築工地工作的農民工,今後20年間還將有4億農村居民移居城市。 <br /><br />普查還將反映中國人口老齡化的速度。政府預計,到2015年左右,每年將有800萬人邁入60歲,比2006年至2010年的平均水準多出320萬。在中國,大量流動人口工作時間不定,居住地也是臨時性的。在此情況下,普查員的工作不會很好做。(作者本·布蘭查) <br /><br />美國《華爾街日報》11月1日報道,原題:北京發現人口普查遭抵制 中國的人口普查反映出流動性日益提高的社會不斷增強的隱私意識及對政府的不信任感。政府希望週一啟動的普查將提供關於公民生活情況的前所未有的大量資訊。不過普查員開始預調查時卻發現人們的抵制情緒高得驚人,大多數人都不像10年前那樣不假思索就配合了。 <br /><br />60歲的李鳳英(音)負責收集所住樓住戶的資訊,“這可真不是個輕省活……過去樓裏多數都是常住人口,大家彼此很熟。現在住了好多外地人。人們的思維也跟過去很不一樣。他們不願意公開隱私。”專家稱,上述問題反映出過去10年來席捲中國的社會巨變。當初,大多數人的工作、住房和福利還依靠國家;而今,多數人都在私營領域工作,有自己的房子。 <br /><br />流動人口是政府最擔心的問題之一。他們提供了經濟發展的廉價勞力,也是社會不穩定的最大潛在因素。雖然年度調查會更新城鄉人口數,但地方官員往往修改流動人口數,從而提升人均收入等數據。今年的人口普查將記錄流動人口的生活和工作地,從而避免這種情況。可問題在於,流動人口不願合作,害怕被遣返或丟掉工作,僱主也保持沉默,擔心被徵稅或違反勞動法。<br /><br />新聞來源:<a href="http://big5.chinabroadcast.cn/gate/big5/gb.cri.cn/27824/2010/11/04/541s3043906.htm" rel="nofollow">人口普查難度遠大於10年前<br /></a><br /><br />人口普查就是資料收集的方法,真實性真確性影響將來的數據分析,在統計學上“誤差率”可能很高。<br /><br />微豆兄,我記得曾讀過新聞報導加拿大的 census 2011,即將展開,並且成為當地社區話題,尤其是應該是 voluntary 還是 mandatory 都已經拗咗一輪,不知結果何如呢?the inner spacenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-10949816518789029902010-11-04T13:29:22.264+08:002010-11-04T13:29:22.264+08:00Space:
Thank you for the excellent, excellent ar...Space: <br /><br />Thank you for the excellent, excellent article on "人民素質展示", as well as the great references on GDP, HDI, GNH, HPI, etc. The richness/divergence of information in your blog is one of the reasons why I keep coming back !!!<br /><br />Your article raises the difficult issue of defining and measuring success in nation building. As you have pointed out, China has advanced tremendously in its "hardware硬件" department but seems to lack behind other developed countries when it comes to "software軟件" (which you call 普偏人民素質). <br /><br />While I agree with you that GNP and GDP measure only a country's economic results and should not be the only indicators of success, I am hesitant to drop them and embrace HDI, GNH, HPI, etc as my new favourites. Just like GNP and GDP, these indices are only indicators of success, but not success itself. <br /><br />In a way, the challenge is like the 瞎子摸象 story, it's the combination of the different descriptive indicators that will provide a more complete picture of what we are imagining is the "real" thing, and even then, we might not all agree on what the "real" thing (in this case: success in nation building) would/should look like. For example: Ever since the release of the 2006 UN Gross National Happiness GNH report 「全球快樂排行榜」which ranked不丹 #1 among Asian countries and 8th in the world, there has not been a big line-up of ppl trying to immigrate into that country (not counting the 100,000 Lhotshampas that had been expelled by the govt). The same with the Happy Planet Index: The tourist industry of Jamaica is hurting because of the reported high crime rate, and yet its HPI was ranked 3rd by the New Economics Foundation in 2009. Even with the widely used HDI Human Development Index, which measure life expectancy, literacy, education and standards of living, some critics are saying that the indicator does not take into account a human being's spiritual and moral development.<br /><br />Conclusions: <br /><br />1. Defining and measuring success in nation building is a complex, multi-faceted task that will require a combination of different indicators, none of which by itself will tell the "real" story. <br /><br />2. The "real" story is real only if everyone agrees to the methodologies of defining and measuring success. Otherwise, nobody can say for sure, whether there is or is not an elephant in the meeting room.Haricot 微豆https://www.blogger.com/profile/13735177985545566818noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-75184182011442422052010-11-03T20:54:51.849+08:002010-11-03T20:54:51.849+08:00以兄:但願我有生之年可以見得到啲 improvement 喇!以兄:但願我有生之年可以見得到啲 improvement 喇!the inner spacenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-67059863538919948312010-11-03T10:30:08.751+08:002010-11-03T10:30:08.751+08:00唉!祖國何時才不再是個金玉皮外的花瓶呢?唉!祖國何時才不再是個金玉皮外的花瓶呢?Ebenezerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07613587789395091487noreply@blogger.com