tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post359434026887936548..comments2023-06-17T19:20:56.162+08:00Comments on Mind Necessity ~~~ 心 空 海 嶽: 威士忌 Whisky 為自己The Inner Spacehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05847812875672255518noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-22170612470762403952009-11-19T00:02:41.020+08:002009-11-19T00:02:41.020+08:00新鮮兄:多謝提醒!對!
》》但係要記住好多中國生產的產品都oem嘢,美國不少大公司係揾中國生產,他們...新鮮兄:多謝提醒!對!<br />》》但係要記住好多中國生產的產品都oem嘢,美國不少大公司係揾中國生產,他們自己都賺很多的,我以前舊公司(s)都幫美國公司生產,啲價錢俾佢哋壓到低無可低,最賺錢嘅唔係中國的工廠,而係美國那些大公司呀!<br /><br />我沒有直接接觸過這方面,祇是曾經聽過這方面的報導,新鮮兄身歷,提出以上觀點,更有說服力,更具公信力,更能服眾。<br /><br />》》若然硬是要把別國的貨幣提高以增加出口,這實在是很野蠻的行為,日本一樣是行低滙價政策,但美國卻没有強烈要求改變,這樣更見美國政策的偏向性和自私心態,很明顯他所做的一切只是為了中國龐大的市場,可惜美國的價錢不是我國人民能承受的,予其把所以責任加諸別的貨幣上,何不檢討一下自己的貨幣和人工高企問題。<br /><br />美國國內工會勢力,已經膨脹到損害美國自身,入骨入肉,美國人不自我調節,是她自己要玩死自己,與人無猶!the inner spacenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-88369266383125724672009-11-17T16:35:22.409+08:002009-11-17T16:35:22.409+08:00因為平啲靚啲,
所以好多美國人都買中國貨囉,
但係要記住好多中國生產的產品都oem嘢,
美國不少大公...因為平啲靚啲,<br />所以好多美國人都買中國貨囉,<br />但係要記住好多中國生產的產品都oem嘢,<br />美國不少大公司係揾中國生產,<br />他們自己都賺很多的,<br />我以前舊公司(s)都幫美國公司生產,<br />啲價錢俾佢哋壓到低無可低,<br />最賺錢嘅唔係中國的工廠,<br />而係美國那些大公司呀!<br /><br />美國人工高,<br />福利好到唔切合當對國家經濟能力,<br />這是另外一個主要問題,<br />以美國生活指數生產出來的商品又點可能夠讓中國平民買得起,<br />若然硬是要把別國的貨幣提高以增加出口,<br />這實在是很野蠻的行為,<br />日本一樣是行低滙價政策,<br />但美國卻没有強烈要求改變,<br />這樣更見美國政策的偏向性和自私心態,<br />很明顯他所做的一切只是為了中國龐大的市場,<br />可惜美國的價錢不是我國人民能承受的,<br />予其把所以責任加諸別的貨幣上,<br />何不檢討一下自己的貨幣和人工高企問題,<br />老實講,以美國現今的經濟實力,<br />國民還可以享受如此高的人工和福利嗎?<br />中國之能夠享受今天的經濟成績,<br />是多少人的超時工作和低微人工所換來的,<br />美國那些工時短人工高的人又怎可以羡慕呢?新鮮人https://www.blogger.com/profile/02377898067921935975noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-14276417841121946092009-11-17T14:34:13.625+08:002009-11-17T14:34:13.625+08:00Hari big brother, How could I not reading this pie...Hari big brother, How could I not reading this piece of article OBAMA: "明言經濟轉型 消費國變出口商" from Ming Pao. <br /><br />I purposely left out that from my "continue readings" 伸延閱覽,becoz this was full of LIES. I would say you are too ignorant IF you really believed in WHAT he said and failed to see what he really meant.<br /><br />You think the key point in his speech about China is that the US intends to change the imbalanced US-China trade relationship.<br /><br />Yes, he is/was, but not in a fair way. I have mentioned in my comments:<br />美國人想中國多買美國貨,但又設下重重關卡,呢樣又話機密不能出口,個樣又說和國防有關不能賣,但對中國臺北就賣軍事武器。祇識得賣漢堡飽、家鄉雞、和美國國庫債劵,有乜用呢?啊!今次可能向中國出口老鼠。<br /><br />HE wants to change but not in a FAIR way. While Beijing already buying from Airbus more than from Boeing, what left for the US to be exported to China, (perhaps some Over US$100 peice of automobile tyre? ) and what really China wsihes to buy, given all those hi-tech goods are prohibited from exporting to China. <br /><br />HE was lying without blinking his eyes 講大話都唔鏨眼 by saying that his wants 消費國變出口商. The only tactic left for OBAMA is/was to press China for the renminbi appreciation. I have warned that China 不要重蹈日本覆轍 should not follow Japanese footsteps !<br /><br />I classified you as a sympathizer of the USA because you too agreed that China, is reaping the profit by importing billion dollars of goods into the US while keeping the value of the Renminbi (artificially) low.<br /><br />Which I do not agree! China earned that money fairly with input of the hard working chinese people (low labour cost). US Goods losing to Chinese goods because their cost of production is too expensive, their price is too HIGH. e.g. Just take the hourly wage(s) of a US workers is so high, US merchandises lose their competitiveness.<br /><br />I believe you are being assimilated by the US becoz canada is too close to the US, and you are both biased and unfair in this area. <br /><br />So I end our discussion right here!<br /><br />Humbly yours <br />The inner space<br />written without proof readingthe inner spacenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-12155430670774050202009-11-17T12:56:01.381+08:002009-11-17T12:56:01.381+08:00經濟轉型: 消費國變出口商,世界工廠變消費國 / Global Economy: Import, E...經濟轉型: 消費國變出口商,世界工廠變消費國 / Global Economy: Import, Export and Consumerism<br />Space:<br /><br />Thank you for putting all the relevant info in one place. I did read your WHOLE article, incl Prez Obama's speech.<br /><br />In his address to the target audience in and outside of Japan, incl Democrats and Republicans alike in the US, there are many foreign policy messages that seem to be key to the future relationships btwn the US and her allies, enemies, and those in btwn.<br /><br />Prez Obama mentioned China in his speech many times, partly to deal head-on with Japan's fear of a renewed US-China relationship at the expense of Japanese interest, but also to send a strong signal to Beijing prior to his visit. Of course, let's not be naïve and think that this was the first trial balloon launched to seek a Chinese reaction. For a major Presidential speech that was expected to garner world attention, a lot of bilateral leg-work would have been done by diplomats through official and unofficial channels. Also, one should not underestimate the pre-emptive statement made by China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson on November 15th re China's positions on Tibet and other issues. All to say, there had been messages back and forth btwn the two countries before Prez Obama stepped onto Chinese soil.<br /><br />I think the key point in his speech abt China is that the US intends to change the imbalanced US-China trade relationship. Currently, US consumerism is out of control and the World's Factory, China, is reaping the profit by importing billion dollars of goods into the US while keeping the value of the Renminbi (artificially) low.<br /><br />I note that you've already posted a lot of info on Prez Obama's visit to China. So I will save some of my comments for later.<br /><br />Attachment: A report from Ming Pao for your info.<br /><br /><br />【明報專訊2009年11月15日】<br /><br />明言經濟轉型 消費國變出口商<br /><br />奧巴馬在東京的演說中,向亞洲國家傳達的一個重要經濟信息,就是美國將加緊推動全球及區域性的自由貿易談判,希望令美國未來轉型成出口導向型經濟體,亞洲經濟增長也不能再依賴美國消費者。他說﹕「這次衰退其中一個重要教訓是,高度依賴美國消費者,以及亞洲靠出口推動經濟增長,都存在局限性。」對美國來說,這個新轉變將是多儲蓄一點、減少財赤和擴大出口,而亞洲國家應致力改善對美貿易失衡。他強調,美國願與亞洲國家共同努力,促成「多哈回合」談判成功,促進世界經濟平衡發展。美經濟學家指出,近年美國在亞洲貿易合作上裹足不前,令中國和亞洲有機會自行大搞自由貿易協議,華府已錯過了「上船」機遇,奧巴馬至少要在經濟層次上,重啟與亞洲的合作。<br /><br />促亞洲改善對美貿易失衡:<br /><br />雖然奧巴馬在演說中沒談到貿易糾紛和人民幣問題,但現實中,美國貿易保護主義問題繼續升溫。繼對中國進口輪胎徵重稅後,美國國際貿易委員會周五也初步裁定,中國和墨西哥無縫銅管在美國「存在傾銷行為,對美國業界造成損害」。美國一些廠家要求向中墨兩國銅管產品開徵最多逾85%的反傾銷稅。<br /><br />(Source: 明報2009年11月15日 星期日 05:10 hk.news.yahoo.com/article/091114/4/f6ax.html)Haricot 微豆https://www.blogger.com/profile/13735177985545566818noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-24401248355363178122009-11-17T09:34:24.256+08:002009-11-17T09:34:24.256+08:00Oh! good to learn that Hari Big brother, awaiting ...Oh! good to learn that Hari Big brother, awaiting for your thoughts. According to my observation you have quite a number of pending items, at your current pace it may be a few days later, do it casually.the inner spacenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17028869.post-54609998337390749712009-11-16T03:29:13.000+08:002009-11-16T03:29:13.000+08:00Thank you for the detailed info. I have read your ...Thank you for the detailed info. I have read your WHOLE article and am in the process of writing out my comments.Haricot 微豆https://www.blogger.com/profile/13735177985545566818noreply@blogger.com